Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 97: 107569, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1129044

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic value of a novel immune-inflammatory index, the interleukin-6-to-lymphocyte ratio (IL-6/LY), with the clinical outcomes of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. METHODS: A cohort study of COVID-19 patients in Tongji Hospital, from January 2020 to February 2020, was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was performed to analyze survival data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with COX proportional hazard regression model. The primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), respectively. RESULTS: Total 320 adult patients were enrolled in our analyses. Patients were divided into low IL-6/LY group and high IL-6/LY group based on the cutoff value with 2.50. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that high-value group (IL-6/LY ≥ 2.50) had a greater risk of poor prognosis (P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that IL-6/LY was the independent risk predictor for in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.404; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.090-10.633, P = 0.035) and MODS development (HR, 4.143; 95%CI, 1.321-12.986, P = 0.015). Meanwhile, IL-6/LY was positively correlated with the MuLBSTA score (r = 0.137, P = 0.031), suggesting that IL-6/LY was associated with long-term mortality (90-day). Furthermore, kinetic analysis revealed that the dynamic changes of inflammatory immune indexes were related to the severity of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The elevated IL-6/LY was related with the increased risk of poor prognosis. Not only that, IL-6/LY could be used for risk stratification and early clinical identification of high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , Interleukin-6/blood , Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/blood , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Kidney Dis (Basel) ; 6(4): 271-283, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-751437

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients are highly vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Medical staff of dialysis facilities without sufficient biosecurity protection are susceptible once exposed to asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. This study evaluated the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 in all MHD patients and medical staff of dialysis facilities in Wuhan, China. METHODS: We collected COVID-19 morbidity and mortality data from MHD patients and medical staff from 52 hemodialysis centers in Wuhan. Then, we analyzed the symptoms and signs of patients and staff in our hospital (Tongji Hospital in Wuhan), and chest CT, SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection and laboratory tests were performed. After aggressive quarantine of the COVID-19 patients, we followed up on the prognosis of them. RESULTS: We analyzed the hemodialysis data from Wuhan and found that 10% of MHD patients and 6.0% of medical staff were suspected of COVID-19. Further detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid showed that 1.7% of MHD patients and 2.9% of medical staff were confirmed as having COVID-19. In our facility, 18.9% (46/244) of patients and 9.5% (6/63) of medical staff were suspected of COVID-19. Among them, 2.9% (7/244) of MHD patients and 4.8% (3/63) of medical staff tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were confirmed as having COVID-19. Interestingly, 87.0% of MHD patients suspected of COVID-19 did not have obvious symptoms, but the CT screening showed features of viral pneumonia. There were no significant differences in symptoms, CT findings, comorbidity and laboratory findings of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic-acid-positive and -negative patients. We followed up these patients and found that 57 patients with COVID-19 died (COVID-19 mortality 8.9%). Two patients from our dialysis center with COVID-19 (mortality 4.3%) died. No new infections occurred in our dialysis center after aggressive quarantine was initiated. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in MHD patients and medical staff in dialysis facilities were both high in Wuhan. Frequent chest CT and SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection were needed to screen COVID-19 patients in dialysis facilities. Through the lessons of this experience on the aggressive diagnosis and quarantine measures of COVID-19 patients, we hope medical staff avoid more infections in serious epidemic areas.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL